It’s been just about three years considering that Smith & Weschild brought out the second generation of its M&P pistols. These pistols sport improvements—inside and also out—over the original M&Ps, however till now tbelow was one thing lacking from the second-generation lineup: a subcompact.

You are watching: Smith and wesson m&p 45 review

The new Smith & Wesboy M&P M2.0 Subcompact is offered in 9mm and also .40 S&W and also with and without a thumb safety. The 9mm and also .40 versions are identical yet for caliber and also capacity. Tright here is also a .45, yet that gun is larger in eexceptionally measurement. The .45 has actually a much longer four-inch barrel, 8+1 capacity and also weighs 2.4 ounces more. Eexceptionally variation of the Subcompact, no matter the caliber, is the same price.

I obtained a sample of the 9mm variation through no thumb security for testing bereason it is likely to be the most renowned variation. The Subcompact sports a 3.675-inch barrel and also a 12-round capacity in 9mm (10 rounds in .40).

Other than its abbreviated size, it provides all the exact same attributes found on the Compact and full-size M&P pistols. These are polymer-framework, striker-fired pistols developed for rigorous usage. Both the slide and also barrel are stainmuch less steel and also offered an Armornite corrosion-resistant end up, and the pistol is rated for +P ammunition.

The steel three-dot sights are collection in the same dimension dovetails as larger M&Ps, so aftersector sights that fit previous M&Ps will certainly fit the Subcompact.

Factory conventional sights are steel with 3 dots, and also the Subcompact has the exact same dovetails as the larger M&Ps so all of the afterindustry sight alternatives favor fiber optics and tritium will certainly fit this pistol also. The M&P has actually an 18-degree grip angle, which in layman’s terms implies it’s a lot closer to a 1911 than, say, a Glock. It arrives through 4 interchangeable backstraps.

With many kind of striker-fired pistols you’ll check out a safety lever before on the cause. With the M&P the trigger itself is the pivoting security lever before. There is an inner striker security as well. As I pointed out, you can additionally buy the Subcompact via a hand-operated security. That lever before is ambidextrous and is located at the optimal rear of the frame, comparable in place to wbelow you’ll uncover the thumb security on a 1911.

The new M2.0 Subcompact is available with or without a thumb safety. Unchoose first-generation M&Ps, the M2.0 dispenses with the beavertail.

This pistol comes with two 12-round magazines. One has actually a flush base pad, the other an extended base pad. With the extfinished base pad magazine in location, I can gain my totality hand on the gun, but once using the flush base pad, my pinkie is left hanging. However, the flush base pad is half an inch shorter, making the gun slightly easier to conceal. I say “slightly” bereason it is commonly the butt of the pistol that prints under apparel.

Before we dive deeper right into the details of the pistol, let’s look at the transforms and also improvements between the first- and second-generation M&Ps. The 2 biggest have to attend to the trigger pull and also the grip.

By far, the 2 many widespread kinds of customization done to first-generation M&P pistols have been create jobs and boosting the texturing of the grip location, typically through stippling.

First-generation M&Ps have an advertised 6.5-pound pull, which seems to be the traditional cause pull weight for pistols designed to be “service tools,” as the M&P was. Heavy create pulls on duty weapons are often supposed to be an additional safety and security. The just trouble via this is many people buying M&Ps aren’t cops, and also the Amerihave the right to customer is acquiring awtotally picky when it involves cause pulls. Heavy create pulls make it harder to shoot accurately, a lot less quickly, and that wants that?

Smith & Weskid engineers took a lengthy look at what was being done to the first-generation M&Ps to enhance the cause pulls, and so for the M&P M2.0 they lessened the trigger pull weight largely with enhanced geomeattempt in the sear and striker. The targeted spec for the M2.0’s trigger pull is 5.5 pounds, and also that’s just what I obtained through my test gun. I’ve actually put many rounds downselection through assorted sizes of M&P M2.0 pistols, and eexceptionally create pull has actually been within a quarter-pound of that 5.5-pound spec.

More than the trigger-pull weight, what a lot of people didn’t favor about the create pull on the original M&P was the absence of a discernible reset. Reset shouldn’t issue in a protective pistol. In any type of self-defense scenario, nobody will certainly be worried around the reset on their trigger; they’ll simply be pulling it as rapid as feasible until the difficulty is fixed. Still, S&W engineers addressed the problem, and also the triggers on the M&P M2.0s have extremely positive reset; you have the right to both hear and also feel it.

Many kind of civilization believed the factory texturing on the grip of the original M&P was also slick. As an outcome, hand-stippling was a common sight. Thanks to contemporary injection-molding approaches, stippling your M&P M2.0 is no much longer crucial. The manufacturing facility texturing on the structure and also backstraps of the M&P M2.0 is as aggressive as stippling, and that is no exaggeration.

I’ve constantly brought the gun I shot in USPSA competition and vice versa, and for years I avoided stippled grips bereason I assumed the stippling would chew via my shirt. Finally, about 10 years ago I obtained my initially stippled grip, and also I will certainly never go earlier.

I lug this up because, as I shelp, the Smith & Weschild framework texturing is as aggressive as hand-stippling, however just favor stippling, you will not need to issue around it wearing via your extending garment. However, I would certainly recommfinish having actually some layer of cloth (a thin T-shirt is all that’s necessary) in between your skin and also the frame of the pistol, or you will certainly experience what clinical experts term a skin abrasion.

The first-generation M&Ps came via 3 sizes of interchangeable backstraps: tiny, tool and large. According to the folks at Smith & Weschild, 80 percent of customers favor the medium backstrap.

M&Ps have never been my first choice for a carry gun sindicate because the pistol never fit my hand also properly. The medium backstrap was just a tiny too small for me, and also the large backstrap adds a tiny little bit of meat on the earlier, yet is mainly just fatter than the medium, which I didn’t desire. The closer a pistol grip is to round, the much less normally it points.

Apparently, I wasn’t the just perboy who had actually this worry. The M&P 2.0 in all sizes comes gave via not 3 yet 4 backstraps: little, medium, medium-large and also huge.

One of the huge improvements in the M2.0 is the inclusion of a fourth backstrap: a medium-big. The gun additionally comes through comes via two grip extenders for bigger mags.

The huge news right here is the medium-large backstrap, which has the same girth as the medium but adds a curve at the optimal to provide even more material under the internet of the shooter’s hand to boost reach to the cause. On both the full-size and also Compact M&P M2.0, I love-love-love the medium-huge backstrap, yet I was surprised to find that on the Subcompact the tool backstrap is a much better fit for me.

That’s the great thing about having actually four sizes of backstraps. They allow you to fit the pistol to your hand as a lot as possible. Swapping out backstraps takes all of 10 secs.

Here is my only complaint around this particular pistol. The M&P M2.0 supplies the exact same prcooktop magazines as the original M&P. I’m guessing Smith & Weskid has actually most extended base pads left over from the first-generation S&W M&P Subcompact, because the one offered through this pistol does not have that aggressive M2.0 texturing. The extfinished base pad felt a little slick under my pinkie.

One complaint I’ve heard about M&Ps for a while is the ambidextrous slide speak. You’ll notice S&W doesn’t term it a “slide release,” because if you’re a southpaw and attempt to release the slide by pushing dvery own on the right-side lever before, fuhgeddaboutit. You’ll find it takes about 4 times as much force as pushing down on the left-side lever. You’re a lot better off simply functioning the slide by hand also.

You could alert the absence of a beavertail on the framework of the second-generation M&Ps. Smith & Wesboy has actually removed the beavertail, so now the rear of the framework doesn’t really stick out any kind of farther than the rear of the slide. On the full-size gun this makes much less of a difference than on this subcompact pistol destined for a concealed-lug duty.

The scalloped serrations at the rear of the slide haven’t adjusted, however through the M2.0 you’ll watch S&W has actually added some minimal serrations at the front of the slide close to the bottom where it meets the structure. I wish S&W had actually been willing to relocate some of the slide marmajesties to totally serprice the front of the slide, however at least the rear serrations are aggressive.

There are tiny cutouts at the bottom of the structure on each side to offer you a tiny better grip on the floorplate of the magazine need to you need to sexpedition one out by hand also.

The inner steel chassis inside the polymer structure is much longer on the M2.0 than on the original M&P. S&W calls it an “installed rigid stainless steel chassis,” and also it additionally has actually an Armornite coating. In the first-generation M&P the chassis didn’t extend much past the front of the trigger guard, yet on the new model the steel in the structure goes most of the means out to the end of the structure.

The inner stainless steel chassis extends practically all the method to the front of the dust cover, making it stiffer and also therefore also more reputable.

On the original M&P the serial number in the steel chassis can be seen via a window cut right into the polymer at the rear of the structure. In the M2.0 the serial number in the steel chassis is situated above the tactical rail, visual proof the chassis extends a lot farther.

This much longer, stiffer structure makes more of a distinction on the full-size M&P, ensuring tbelow won’t be any kind of flex if you hang a big weapon light on the frame’s tactical rail. But also through the Subcompact, much less structure flex equates to better relicapacity.

The “loaded-chamber indicator” is ssuggest a hole with the rear of the barrel hood. It is practically usemuch less in anypoint various other than straight sunlight, yet it enables the M&P to be offered in says that mandate particular safety functions on guns.

I was lucky enough to gain some severe create time with the M2.0 at the S&W Academy as soon as the gun was initially introduced. At the time, the editor of a major gun magazine renoted he thought the brand-new gun should be referred to as the “M&P 1.1” because in his opinion tbelow weren’t many changes to it.

But I’ll counter that’s bereason not many kind of points necessary to be done to the M&P. Did I point out any type of changes S&W made to the architecture to enhance reliability, which is the a lot of necessary facet of any kind of protective firearm? No. They didn’t make any type of because none essential to be made. That claims a lot.

Range time through the Subcompact carried no surprises. It fired every little thing I fed it and was nicely exact for a subcompact.

Notes: Accuracy results are the averperiods of 4 five-shot groups at 25 yards from a sandbag rest. Velocities are averperiods of 10 shots measured through an Oehler Model 35P 12 feet from the muzzle. Abbreviations: FMJ, full steel jacket; JHP, jacketed hollowpoint

The M&P Subcompact is a lot smaller than the full-size M&P, yet it is not a pocket gun, and you will require a holster. That shelp, it will certainly fit right into any type of holster created the first-generation M&P Subcompact and also conceal under simply about any kind of garment.

A great testimonial of this pistol wouldn’t be complete without a comparikid to its closest competitor: the M&P Shield. A lot of world think one of the factors why Smith & Weschild was so slow to present a subcompact variation of the M&P M2.0 is because of the success of the subcompact Shield. They can be best, however these are far from identical firearms.

The M&P Subcompact is the exact same elevation as the Shield, yet it is roughly a half-inch much longer, weighs a couple of ounces even more, and is noticeably thicker. The Subcompact looks and also feels like a chunk of a gun compared to the exceptionally flat Shield. However before, that thickness doesn’t simply offer a nice personality; it offers you substantially more capacity than the Shield.

These pistols are the exact same height only if the Shield is wearing its flush seven-round magazine. Meanwhile, the Subcompact uses a 12-round capacity. Plus, you can repack the Subcompact via those massive sticks supposed for the Compact and/or full-size M&P M2.0, which ups your capacity to 15 or 17 rounds. Last, the Subcompact has actually the 4 interchangeable backstraps, which the Shield does not.

If this sounds prefer I’m ganging up on the Shield, I don’t intend to. The Shield is absolutely simpler to conceal and also bring than the Subcompact, yet that doesn’t come without a price. The great thing about the Subcompact is that if you’re a fan of the M&P style and wanted a small, concealable pistol, you currently have one more option.

Amerihave the right to consumers have actually had accessibility to compact 9mm pistols for decades. I owned a Smith & Weskid 3913 back in the late ’90s, and the pistols of today are far superior to those firearms of yesteryear.

The Smith & Weskid M&P M2.0 Subcompact is a perfect example. They have better ergonomics, vastly improved relicapability, much better texturing on the grips, better sights, better everything. And as soon as you readjust for inflation, you’ll check out that thanks to advances in production, they price less, also.

See more: Consulado De Mexico En San Francisco Ca No En San Francisco, Consulado General De México En San Francisco Ca


TYPE: striker-fired semiauto CALIBER: 9mm Luger (tested), .40 S&W, .45 ACP (larger dimensions than 9mm, .40) CAPACITY: 12+1 BARREL LENGTH: 3.7 in. OAL/HEIGHT/WIDTH: 6.6/4.5/1.2 in. WEIGHT: 24.0 oz. CONSTRUCTION: Armornite-coated stainmuch less steel slide, polymer framework TRIGGER: 5.5 lb. pull (measured) SIGHTS: 3-dot steel SAFETIES: sear block drop, trigger safety lever before (as tested) PRICE: $569

Buy it now. Log on to, pick this firearm, pay a deposit and it will be at your neighborhood gun save in two days. When purchased from, Davidson’s guarantees to repair or replace this