*

Only it wasn"t this one. The account I saw had this name:
xsaonpush.

You are watching: If only our tongues were made of glass quote

When I changed the following day, I was greeted with the message that the above account had actually been suspended. Odd. So, I searched aobtain, just this time utilizing the keywords "tongues" and also "glass," -- 2 words in the title of the poem in question -- and also discovered that On Press was still in organization.

*

*

xseionpush. All accounts sported the exact same On Press logo and also spouted the exact same tweets. One might attempt to make a case that these accounts are not "disruptive" or "abusive" (and I"d love to watch them make that claim), however there"s bit doubt On Press Inc"s multiple accounts are "overlapping." (
vseawonpush is the only account not suspfinished at the moment of this writing.)Now, although I was receiving the exact same stream of misspellings and also misinformation from On Press as the various other individuals posting Shaun Shane"s (unattributed) poem, I wasn"t seeing any kind of indications of life. I was pretty a lot convinced it was a bot running multiple accounts. To test that concept, I called out On Press on the false claims directed my way, particularly the assertion that Twitter would delete my account for a single violation. To my surpincrease, it provoked an extremely human reactivity.

*

So, tright here was a huguy behind the account, one that handily offered a connect to the regards to service that straight contradicted what he had actually simply said. (I"ve shifted pronouns, yet an explanation is on the method.)Once I had his/its attention, I pointed out On Press" suspicious actions -- namely, the multiple suspfinished accounts linked to its name.

*

On Press responded via this blast of angry tweets, stating that Twitter itself created these accounts for it.

*

It shouldn"t should be sassist, however this insurance claim is completely false. Mike contacted Twitter to ask around whether or not, as On Press claims, it creates thousands of instantly produced accounts for service providers via which to harass infringers, and (no surprise) Twitter shelp tright here is no reality to this insurance claim.I attempted to gather more indevelopment, yet my overtures were rejected. At one suggest, an On Press account mentioned it percreated this "service" for "other authors" but refoffered to name any type of. It also failed to cough up a usable URL that can show On Press Inc exists outside of multiple Twitter accounts.Shortly afterwards, the accounts went ballistic, showering me through a long list of legal hazards.

*

So, is On Press ssuggest Shaun Shane, reclusive poet and attribution seeker? He"d definitely be the perboy most interested in enforcing this. His imperhaps glowing bio at PoemHunter puts Shane in Schrodinger"s Box, theorizing that he"s dead ("...had come to be terminally ill and also his re-emergence wregarding reinforce the ethic of Pure Poetry or Truly Modernist Poeattempt prior to his fatality..."), prior to theorizing in the opposite direction a couple of sentences later on ("though it is thought, if he is still alive, he stays on the West Coast...") One of the On Press Twitter accounts I dealt with asserted Shane was dead and also had actually willed that his work be offered to raise money for miscellaneous children"s charities. (Too poor no one"s trying to market that book...) This claim is echoed at Pinterest, where the same sort of attribution-badgering occurs.Mike MicheWhether Mr. Miche is genuine or sindicate Shaun utilizing another name stays to be prstove. (It does share a Shaun Shane-prefer bit of alliteration.) Miche patrols Pinteremainder, sfinishing individuals who re-pin this photo the exact same type of messperiods as the Twitter accounts execute, only without the character limit.Miche likewise sporting activities the exact same shaky legal grasp and also penchant for baseless risks.

*

Here Miche chases down a user (that deleted her tweet) and also proceeds harassing her at her Pinterest account, claiming that people choose her using an unattributed quote can "cause untold billions of dollars of shed for suppliers who support and publisher Authors works." Miche likewise seems to make the case that she"s legally responsible for any retweets (a insurance claim echoed in return by the On Press Twitter accounts).Also of note: the single DMCA notification attributed to On Press was issued by Mike Miche. The notice has actually the sender"s name redacted, yet a duckduckgo search reveals Miche"s name in the search results. If this is really Shaun Shane, he"s either making use of false indevelopment to file DMCA notices, or Mike Miche is his genuine name (Shaun Shane is a pseudonym, according to his bio).Alexandria HopewellHopewell has sent similar messperiods to Facebook customers, again seeking attribution and making use of the same wording.

See more: Which Of The Following Is Not A Strong Electrolyte? ? Fluid And Electrolyte Balance: Medlineplus

*

*

A user named "Sean Seans" describes himself as "Shaun" and tells her he loves and also misses her. And that Sean Seans/Shaun is additionally busy chasing down wrongdoers posting unattributed poems.

*