CD Projekt RED"s 3rd Witcher combine the series" non-linear storytelling with a sprawling open world that concludes the saga that Geralt the Rivia.
You are watching: Do i need to play witcher 1 before 2
I"m not sure I completely understand but yes you have the right to probably skip the Witcher 1 for a selection of different reasons.
As for exactly how much one"s savegames native Witcher 1 & 2 will influence 3, i can"t comment since I simply don"t know. But, I will say that once it comes to the an initial 2 games, ns actually enjoyed the story in 1 more than ns did in 2. However, gameplay-wise I thought 2 was much better (mostly the combat).
I am sure you deserve to just skip 1 (and probably 2 as well) and be simply fine play 3, but given the both the enlarge games expense next come nothing these days and also frequently popular music up in GOG and vapor sales; if you have actually the time I"d say walk for it. In spite of some flaws and klunky bits, both are fantastic RPGs in their own right, giving plenty of hours of fun.
I"m replaying the first game right now. I very doubt any type of story decision will influence Witcher III in any kind of way. However, it"s tho a really great (and relatively weird) RPG. It doesn"t really play quite prefer anything else. I"m surprised at exactly how much I"m enjoy it it on a second playthrough numerous years later.
If you have time I would recommend play 1 and 2. When the choices will probably be more of a nod to witcher fans and also a few minor scenes I would certainly still recommend it. And while w2 is a much better game , the initial is much more atmospheric and felt the environments and quests were more personal and grounded. And the original sore is therefore much much better than the second one. So prefer I said if you have actually 60+ hrs for both games prior to W3 offer it a shot. It creates Geralt who he is and also such.
Keep in mind the the very first one is rather slow paced and the combat is no its forte. And also the voice exhilaration is not as great for npcs and also so on. Its one old pc game. For this reason yeah. Yet personally I like W1 far much more than W2 also if the gameplay part of the is no as good.
ns tried come play the an initial Witcher game and also couldn"t acquire into the for some reason. Ns just offered up 6 hrs in.
I review a story an overview online and jumped straight right into 2 and also loved it.
I"m currently playing the Witcher 1 because that the very first time. The is a really slow start, the took till act 2 to obtain me hooked, but now that i realized what the game actually is it"s amazing. The game isn"t for everyone, but I"d say play witcher 1 atleast until, and also a little bit of, act 2.
Your options are so unlikely to issue it is beyond unimportant come play it. Lock barely mattered in Witcher 2. Additionally yes, the gameplay is in reality pretty poor so that is worth skipping for that too. If girlfriend really desire an appreciation because that what is going on in witcher 3 and also the characters involved you need to read the books, no play the games.
If you prefer the first game, you should complete it. It"s quite cool. Yet yeah as much as choices and saves go, you might as well skip it.
Your selections are so unlikely to issue it is beyond unimportant to play it. Lock barely mattered in Witcher 2.
Yeh because that story and also worldstate reasons theres no have to play 1 and also 2. 1 is the much better game yet the gameplay in 2 is more than likely much the very same as in 3 for this reason if friend wanna gain in mood because that TW3 play part TW2.
The just reason come play the very first game is if you desire to know more about the lore and the world. That"s a decision girlfriend can easily make later after you"ve finished the Witcher 2 since I can"t check out that her decisions would certainly play into the 2nd game at all anyway. What I appreciated of the Witcher 1 was greatly the story and finding out more about the world, but I also found the to be a little of a slog after a while. It"s not precisely a quick game, IIRC.
Shouldn"t we have learned by currently that story selections don"t really typical anything. If you want to recognize the story, you should play both games.
You also shouldn"t skip one and play two. One is a far better game. The story is better and I choose the gameplay. It"s a small clunky yet it"s unique and works well once you number it out. In the second one they made it more in line with how every other 3rd person game plays.
I really can"t speak what"s going to lug over into this game"s story yet.
Anyways, i think 2 is much far better than 1 (which is really good in some locations and really flawed in others). No that 2 is perfect but in its entirety I think it"s certainly better and an ext approachable. If you have actually the time and also really want to go back to 1 it"s constantly there.
Obviously part 1 fans in this object but overall I"d say it"s less popular. Mine biggest worry was it to be the pacing and also I assumed it was as well long. I"m guessing more things indigenous 2 lug over (from story to choices to gameplay mechanics).
i think it"s worth playing the Witcher 1 top top easy simply for the story. The combat is no great, and playing that on easy is pretty much the same video game with much faster combat (and much less chance that losing, naturally).
It"s additionally perfectly fine to skip the Witcher 1, honestly.
Witcher 1 had great story and it set the world better than the W2. Likewise Witcher 1 feels more like a witcher type of adventure - at the very least comparing to the very first book stories. Ns doubt that the choices lug over in any type of meaningful way.
How about the books? sword of Destiny was great introduction to the people of the witcher and also the Last wish has important chapter relating to the W3.
artisanbreads: the less famous becouse it was a relativly unknown video game which noone played. Its the Demon souls the the souls series. Most people that recommends 2 over 1 either "tried" come play 1 after play 2 many years ~ its release or they didnt play it at all. Favor
punched claimed the combat is bad in both games yet at least its unique in 1. Ns dont intend the combat to it is in very great in 3 either.
artisanbreads: its less popular becouse it to be a relativly unknown video game which noone played. That is the Demon souls of the souls series. Most world that recommends 2 end 1 one of two people "tried" come play 1 after playing 2 numerous years after its release or they no play it at all. Prefer
punched claimed the combat is bad in both games but at the very least its distinct in 1. I dont intend the combat to it is in very great in 3 either.
No i played the right when it come out and also then played 2. Ns think there"s plenty come not choose in 1. I favor the combat in 2 a lot of more, also though it end up gift repetitive.
Not saying it"s a negative game all at once but there"s pretty big issues v it to me.
artisanbreads: ns was commenting on TW1 being in its entirety less renowned not your stance on it. Girlfriend made great arguments and theres nothing wrong with placing 2 above 1 if thats exactly how you feel.
Th question of story and also choice consequence has been answered but I simply wanted to article to speak that ns much desired Witcher 1 at the end of the day. It feels old and has the flaws, yet once girlfriend play because that a bit and get past some antiquated aspects, ns feel it"s much more lucrative of an experience. Also somehow ns really preferred the combat, which I recognize isn"t the most renowned opinion.
i haven"t play 2 yet so no discuss that one. I completed the an initial one a pair years earlier and have to admit that I moved myself to beat it due to the fact that I didn"t desire to leaving it unfinished. That said, i did reap playing v the an initial half or 3/4 that the game. To it is in honest, I only bought the 2nd one due to the fact that it dropped down to $5 and I thought, "Hey, it"s worth it come me to shot it the end for a couple hours for five bucks." after looking into reviews more, I"m quite excited in ~ this point. Ns just mounted it yesterday because that the an initial time. (I"ve to be working with a backlog that games.)
I think i would have actually liked The Witcher 1 more if that wasn"t for the dumb Alvin subplot. (Which led right into the also dumber twist ending.)
It kinda reminded me of something choose Skyrim, in that the most exciting stuff taken place to the side of the story. The main plot was pretty throwaway and forgettable. It"s pretty good at civilization building, however it more than likely won"t be that appropriate to 3.
That being said, ns did reap it sufficient that I almost immediately go out and bought the very first Witcher book after finishing it, therefore take the for what girlfriend will.
You should play The Witcher simply to see exactly how much of an advancement The Witcher 2 is. Take it from the what girlfriend will.
I favored the Witcher 1 quite a bit, and also liked the Witcher 2 a bit much less so. 1 felt very unique, naught else like it.
I deserve to understand wanting to skip the an initial one, I had actually to force myself to play the video game up till the critical chapter (maybe 2nd to last?) when shit hit the fan and things obtained interesting.
But you will miss out on methods to do allies i m sorry will help you in the sequel. I"m guessing the deafult begin on Witcher 2 presume you"ve do no good friends in the very first game. It will certainly still be a fun game though. Go ahead and skip 1 if friend want.
See more: Use The Laplace Transform To Solve The Following Initial Value Problem
I never played 2 but right currently i"m playing with the very first game, about 8 hrs in and also it has definitely been a an excellent experience therefore far. You should obtain it, it"s on revenue pretty frequently too, i gained it for around 1€ or something favor that.
I just finished The Witcher 2 again. I first played it near the finish of 2013; this was before I purchase the an initial on Steam, as I had actually bought the first last year, and had simply beat that on Monday. If I would say you don"t need to play it; that goes for either of castle really, i would totally recommend friend play both. Ns think you"d get more out the the suffer if you play both. Just playing The Witcher 2 again, i had entirely forgot a many the story, so ns am happy ns replayed it, and also I appreciated the story and also characters a bit much more due to playing the first. Ns am yes, really happy ns played both the an initial two games. I"m all set for three now :). The said, I"ll need to use the Bard (or everyone the character will certainly be) the implements my options from the an initial two gamings into three, since I play the first on Steam, The Witcher 2 top top 360, and I"ll probably be playing three on the PS4. If ns were you, I"d regret no playing the first, yet that"s me. Also, I thought both had far better qualities come them over the other, so no of them to be overall better than the other I think. I must say the an initial takes time to obtain into though; I had played that on and off in short bursts early on, yet it finally clicked at part point, especially because I want to check out it through before three. Ns recommend skip the contract missions.